- Architects: estudio relativo
- Location: Santo Tomé, Argentina
- Architects In Charge: Cecilia Rossini, Guido Hernandez
- Area: 250.zero m2
- Project Year: 2013
- Photographs: Ramiro Sosa
- Colaboradores: Fernando Nieva, Angelina Romero, Federico Gigante
Text description supplied by way of the architects. It is a area for a tender couple, positioned in a closed community within the outskirts of Santa Fe. The mortgage intended the chance to advertise a primary example of development, permitting an early career of the valuables. In this primary level, a sequence of coordinated extensions would regularly occur in each and every case in step with the rising priorities of its occupants. The peculiarities of the mortgage, allowed decoding it as a suitable situation during which to check enlargement hypotheses and diversifications of the home house to the modern re-configuration of the circle of relatives scene.
Therefore, the dynamics of the fresh circle of relatives, with its incorporations and ruptures as an indeterminate mission, in everlasting procedure, in order that the seek for a definitive scheme is have shyed away from in a aware means: a plan that determines as soon as and for all and endlessly the nature of the development and the future of the areas. Instead, it proposed a method of implementation, a constructive-spatial device of atomic, cell, devoid of hierarchies and rhizomatic and indefinite enlargement. Thus housing (on this case), as a dwelling organism, accompanies and adapts to the circle of relatives nucleus in transit via its a couple of ages, settling in from the making plans phases of labor in a situation of completely unfinished, to be achieved, to reinvent itself .
The proposed device is composed of a sequence of modules whose measurement traits recommend the kinds of use (social or intimate ‘cells’) and reinforce ‘cells’ for each inner areas and for outside and semi-covered areas. In all circumstances, it was once sought, in serve as of operationalizing the design to maximise the touch of each and every cellular with an outer house; and decrease the touch of the cells with each and every different, being essentially the most optimum, throughout the opening of a door. In this fashion the ‘cells’ gain independence and privateness, whilst multiplying the choices of enlargement and dispersion.
We consider the construction in once more, already occupied by way of different habitants; dressed in scientific places of work, scholar pension, social membership; attaching new modules and setting apart oneself one thousand occasions and in one thousand alternative ways; as a construction of programmable (and unprogrammable) career , decharacterized or with out recognizable face. A work of community micro-urbanism suffering from the block, greater than a novel piece of structure. A suggestion of positive and social material.